Filter pedagogies by:

Reset All

Division:  

-








Class Type:  

-









Faculty:  

-





36 Results

One-on-one Consultations

Faculty met with students one-on-one (in or out of class).

Homework

Faculty asked students to work outside of class on homework, reading, research, or to practice recent lessons or to prepare for upcoming classes.

Student Presentations

Faculty asked students to present to the whole class (including recitations or demonstrations).

Independent Study

Faculty provided opportunities for students to independently study or analyze a topic of their own choosing.

Student-led Discussions

Faculty asked individual students to prepare for and lead a class discussion.

Lecture

Faculty provided extended verbal explanations and clarifications to the whole class.

Slide-based Presentation

Faculty projected slides, images, web-pages, or other visual media while providing narration.

Socratic Dialogue

Faculty called on students to answer a series of pointed questions.

Team-Teaching

Faculty had a co-teacher or guest lecturer join the class, either live or online.

Model Critical Thinking

Faculty modeled a critical thinking process.

Democratic Decisions

Faculty invited students to share democratically in decisions about the course goals, processes or products.

Think-pair-share

Faculty asked students to talk briefly in pairs to discuss each other’s understanding of an idea or problem.

Small Groups

Faculty had students work in groups of 3-5 students to solve problems, discuss, or complete assignments.

Team Projects

Faculty had students work in teams on a significant or lengthy project.

Class Discussion

Faculty began a whole class discussion.

Minute papers

Faculty asked students to write short informal responses in class to capture or frame their thinking.

Journaling

Faculty asked students to write in a journal, blog, wiki, and/or discussion board.

Writing as Process

Faculty used processes to improve writing (pre-writing, research, thesis development, multiple drafts, revisions, conferences, etc.).

Peer Editing

Faculty asked students to edit or comment on each other’s work in class.

Primary Sources

Faculty required the finding of primary sources to support arguments.

Open-ended Problems

Faculty asked students to solve or brainstorm about problems that have more than one answer.

Experiential Learning

Faculty constructed environments (like labs or fields trips) where students learn by working with real world scenarios.

Service Learning

Faculty had the class work with not-for-profit agencies, either directly or using their data.

Case Studies

Faculty used real world cases or examples to ground student learning.

Clickers & Polling

Faculty used in-class polling either manually or electronically to check for understanding or opinion.

Flipping Class

Faculty recorded lectures for students to view outside of class to prepare for in-class discussion or problem solving.

Culminating Projects

Faculty had students create non-written projects as a culminating experience (physical representations, videos, web-pages, performances, programs, etc. (might include some writing)).

P.O.G.I.L. (Worksheets)

Faculty used worksheets to guide students through a learning process.

Quizzes or ConcepTests

Faculty gave short graded quizzes or concept tests.

Just-in-time Teaching

Faculty used student homework to adjust your lesson, lecture, or activities just before class.

Essential Questions

Faculty used an essential question, prompt or challenge to start class.

Tests

Faculty gave tests or exams.

Test-wrappers

Faculty discussed test questions beforehand, and reviewed answers afterwards.

Inclusive Pedagogy

Faculty offered activities intended to build an inclusive and welcoming classroom.

Identity Development

Faculty used texts or data that deal with race, gender, class, orientation, or identity issues.

Collaborative Learning

Faculty used role play, fishbowl, facilitated dialogues, or other collaborative learning techniques.